Toggle display of website navigation Argument: October 4,9: President Donald Trump issued an explosive claim, alleging that China was engaging in a campaign to influence the outcome of U. However, circumstantial evidence is not enough.
Share via Email Britain's national newspapers are losing their ability to influence politics, argues Canadian media analyst Ken Goldstein in an openDemocracy essay.
He begins by charting the circulation declines of the papers from the s onwards, which British readers can take as read.
If you want the numbers, go here for pdf. Having set the scene with such data, Goldstein then gets to the heart of his argument: In that piece, I questioned the assumption that voters act as newspapers tell them. And Goldstein says "similar disconnects between newspaper editorial support and election outcomes can be found in Canada and the US.
On the other hand, it is certainly not as neutral and lacking in influence as proprietors and editors tend to say. But I need to take my argument on further because I think I need to make my position crystal clear, lest it be suggested that I deny the continuing, and baleful, influence of Britain's press proprietors and editors.
I agree with Goldstein about the the importance of setting press influence on the political process within the context of other influences. We do not live - as journalists and politicians tend to do - in a newspaper bubble.
However, and this is particularly true of the British experience, we he should not underestimate the way in which the national press - despite falling sales - retains an influence over the totality of the media agenda.
Broadcasters and bloggers tend to respond to the stimulus of a news and comment schedule that originates in newspapers. The material that appears most often in the main current affairs programmes on TV and radio, plus radio phone-in shows, is almost always based on follow-ups to stories in the national press.
In such a way, papers still command the nation's central political narrative. This activity is hugely influential in the periods between elections, and much more important than the immediate pre-election calls for people to vote one way or another.
For example, in the years leading up to the election, the Labour party's leader, Neil Kinnock, suffered from vitriolic negative coverage. The final assault on his character, which cost him a poll victory, was the culmination of that process.
Similarly, Gordon Brown's defeat was assured by highly critical press coverage well before he ever called last year's election.
The newspapers' daily drip-drip-drip of stories and commentaries - whether positive or negative - do influence the electorate, including those people who never read the papers. The repetition, and the influence over other media, are the key to creating a broad consensus.
So I depart from Goldstein markedly, despite his having cited my remarks. But let's go back to his conclusion: New technology may have conquered the scarcity of channels, but that is increasingly yielding fragmented audiences based on far more choices and more narrowly-defined interests.
And he may well agree with Goldstein's final comment about fragmentation: But we are some way from that yet, if at all.Argument China’s Influence Operations Are Pinpointing America’s Weaknesses From Iowa to Louisiana, Beijing has mapped out the pressure points of U.S.
politics. The media today are more diffuse and chaotic than ever. The result is a new paradigm in political communications, and both parties are using . A study published in Perspectives on Politics, “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens,” analyzes the relative influence of political actors on policymaking.
The researchers sought to better understand the impact of elites, interest groups and voters on the passing of public policies. It is worth noting that many studies in this area take social media use as the starting point or “independent variable,” and therefore cannot rule out that some “deeper” cause — political interest, for example — is the reason people might engage in SNS use in the first place.
Further, some researchers see SNS use as a form of participation and . The Influence and Relationship of the Media in Politics, Campaigns and Elections - In an age of timeliness and demand for information, the media plays a crucial role in informing the public about politics, campaigns and elections.
The Influence and Relationship of the Media in Politics, Campaigns and Elections - In an age of timeliness and demand for information, the media plays a crucial role in informing the public about politics, campaigns and elections.